« I Was Not Buried Alive in a Cave Earthquake. Luckily. | Main | UPDATE: Legs Safely UNensconced, Other Sources of Happiness »

October 17, 2006

Leggings: Only for Lemmings?

Are they empirically ugly? Universally unflattering? Or a cute new trend I should try when I go fall clothes shopping tomorrow?

Posted by jen at October 17, 2006 02:22 PM

Comments

Enh. I don't really like this whole leggings trend. But then I like Crocs, so maybe I'm not always the best judge.

Posted by: Gwen at October 17, 2006 02:58 PM

fun but ugly, trust me, i was a fashion victiom in the 80's and had a ton of them. some things are NOT meant to come back again (think acid wash jeans, big hair, nylon in general)

Posted by: Nicole at October 17, 2006 03:59 PM

Leggings are making a comeback? I think I looked cute in them back in the 80s. Doesn't mean I would wear them now though.

Posted by: Dagny at October 17, 2006 04:41 PM

It really depends on your legs.

good legs will always pull leggings off. Regardless of era.

Posted by: daniel at October 17, 2006 11:10 PM

I wore leggings constantly in the 80's and early 90's. I wore them under skirts, boxer shorts, long shirts/sweaters, etc. I treated them like really thick tights. And I love me some patterned and/or solid tights.

I think that leggings should be for not-so-serious wear. They're really just frivolous and not for the office or a date.

Posted by: Samantha at October 18, 2006 06:57 AM

I don't know. I'm a guy. But thanks for asking ;-)

Posted by: Chris at October 18, 2006 08:05 AM

if you're wearing them as tights and you clearly are actually wearing pants a dress or a skirt, fine.

if you are wearing them as leggings? NO. BAD. BAD. BAD.

Posted by: carolyn at October 18, 2006 11:33 AM

No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No.

I normally read your blog in Google Reader, but felt so strongly about this that I opened a new tab, *manually typed in your site's URL into my browser's destination bar* (a heroic feat if ever there was one) and clicked on the 'Comments' link just to tell you not to do it.

*That's* how much I love you and want for you to not wear leggings.

Posted by: Jeff at October 18, 2006 11:51 AM

So if I am following Carolyn, then it is OK if I wear them under a dress or pants -- like I did in the 80s. But no way that I would consider wearing them anywhere serious.

Posted by: Dagny at October 18, 2006 04:46 PM

leggings = YUCK.

Posted by: gloria at October 19, 2006 10:32 AM

oh god. empirically ugly!!!!! universally unflattering!!!!!

Posted by: brenda in toronto at October 20, 2006 07:20 AM

So...did you buy them???

Posted by: Jenna at October 20, 2006 11:31 AM

Empirically ugly and universally unflattering. I usually lurk, but I care enough to tell you NOT to indulge. No formal shorts, either, and skinny jeans only with EXTREME caution.

Posted by: Kristy at October 20, 2006 03:08 PM

OK. After reading over some of the above comments, I think it all boils down to what you think of your personal style. If you are conservative, then leggings are not your thing. Neither are formal shorts or skinny jeans. There are a few women who can pull off these items with success though. A very limited number if you are talking about formal shorts.

Posted by: Dagny at October 20, 2006 06:11 PM

Leggings - no, please, don't do it! I, too, loved them in the 80s! But I also loved my Cyndi Lauper shaved criss cross haircut and my Flashdance sweatshirt!

Posted by: Lisa at October 22, 2006 04:13 PM

Actually my favorite use of leggings in the 80s was to wear them under jeans that had become a little worn over time.

Posted by: Dagny at October 22, 2006 07:34 PM

But leggings look great on good legs!!! And I'm not just playing devil's advocate for once. Mmm that made me think of avocado. Now I'm hungry.
Fucking thanks Jen.


(PS. did you get some?)
(PPS. did you get some leggings?)

Posted by: daniel at October 24, 2006 09:58 PM